iCommons

Content Mining Manifesto

June 3, 2012

The Open Science Working Group has posted a draft manifesto demanding rights to mine digital resources where users have legitimate access to them. The manifesto asserts:

Principle 1: Right of Legitimate Accessors to Mine. The right to read is the right to mine.
Principle 2: Lightweight Processing Terms and Conditions. Users and providers should encourage machine processing.
Principle 3: Use. Facts don’t belong to anyone.

Dr. Peter Murray-Rust has invited comment at A Scientist and the Web.

Creative Commons statement to the Committee on IP and Development at WIPO

May 11, 2012

From TechnoLlama:

Creative Commons affiliate Andrés Guadamuz attended the 9th session of the Committee on IP and Development at WIPO to present CC’s comment on the Agenda Item CDIP/9/INF/2: Scenarios and Possible Options Concerning Recommendations 1c, 1f and 2a of the Scoping Study on Copyright and Related Rights and the Public Domain. The Study by Prof Dussolier can be located here for reference. The recommendations that we are talking about are:

“1(c) The voluntary relinquishment of copyright in works and dedication to the public domain should be recognised as a legitimate exercise of authorship and copyright exclusivity, to the extent permitted by national laws (possibly excluding any abandonment of moral rights) and upon the condition of a formally expressed, informed and free consent of the author. Further research could certainly be carried out on that point. [...]

1(f) International endeavours should be devoted to developing technical or informational tools to identify the contents of the public domain, particularly as far as the duration of copyright is concerned. Such tools can be data collections on works, databases of public domain works, or public domain calculators. International cross-operation and cross-referencing of such tools is of particular importance. [...]

2(a) The availability of the public domain should be enhanced, notably through cooperation with cultural heritage institutions and UNESCO (through its work on the preservation of intangible cultural heritage).”

Creative Commons statement to the CDIP on the Public Domain

Thank you Mr Chairman, we would like to congratulate you on your election to preside this Committee.

In his keynote presentation to the Global INET Conference here in Geneva just a couple of weeks ago, Dr Francis Gurry described intellectual property as a balancing mechanism for all of the often competing rights and equities that occur in and around the creation of innovation. Creative Commons strongly believes in this balance of rights, and strives to offer technical and legal tools to make that balance possible. We also believe that an integral part of that balance has to be the protection and promotion of the Public Domain. The public domain enriches the global cultural and intellectual environment; it allows the reproduction and reuse of countless classics that are often modernized and reintroduced to new audiences and new generations. One could almost say that they are remixed.

It is with that in mind that we welcome the Secretariat’s inclusion on this session of the Scenarios and Possible Options Concerning Recommendations 1c, 1f and 2a of The Scoping Study on Copyright and Related Rights and The Public Domain, and commend the author of The Scoping Study, Prof. Severine Dusollier. We encourage the adoption of all three recommendations, but we would like to complement the information contained in the document with regards to recommendations 1c and 1f.

With regards to Recommendation 1c, and as the document CDIP/9/INF/2 accurately describes, Creative Commons offers CC0, a universal tool that allows users to voluntarily relinquish all copyright, database and related rights to the fullest extent allowed by law. CC0 is a tool that was conceived and created out of both necessity and demand. Dedicating works to the public domain is difficult if not impossible for those wanting to contribute, voluntarily and of their own free will, their works for public use before applicable copyright or database protection terms expire. Few if any jurisdictions have a process for doing so easily and reliably. Laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction as to what rights are automatically granted and how and when they expire or may be voluntarily relinquished. We understand the inherent difficulties with dealing with this issue in a comprehensive manner given the different approaches to copyright seen from Common and Civil legal traditions. Moreover, our conversations with copyright holders over CC’s 10 years in existence revealed that for some rights holders, there is a desire to signal clearly and unequivocally that their work may be used without reference to restrictions that the holder no longer wishes to retain for any number of reasons. This demand, coupled with the complex and lack of harmonized copyright frameworks, resulted in the creation of CC0. CC0 has been leveraged by numerous important rights holders, including the Dutch Government, the British Library, and the Personal Genome Project, and is part of the legal framework for important projects such as Europeana. For these reasons, we second the Secretariat’s recommendation to conduct a study on copyright relinquishment, and we also encourage this Committee to continue this important avenue.

With regards to Recommendation 1f, we once again welcome the Secretariat’s specific mention of the practices and tools available through Creative Commons. The possibility of marking copyright works with license metadata can tell search engines what is available for reuse, and under which conditions. We applaud all of the national and regional practices cited in the Secretariat’s document, and agree that these efforts must continue. Specifically, we encourage member states and regional bodies to continue to attempt to make public registry data more widely available. We would like to see a more proactive role by WIPO in the international arena. Among other promising avenues, WIPO could host some tools to facilitate the sharing of public registry information on their website, such as an aggregated database of existing registries

Concluding, Creative Commons thoroughly supports efforts that will enhance the ability of rightsholders to voluntarily relinquish copyright thereby enriching the public domain, and of the public to access and use the public domain as copyright law full intends.

Thank you.

New Online Journal of Public Interest IP

May 9, 2012

From Public Interest Intellectual Property Advisors:

The Journal of Public Interest IP is the first publication of its kind that solely focuses on the range of legal rights within the umbrella of IP and the complex ways it impacts human capabilities and endeavors. The human development and capabilities approach will provide a broad and useful framework for analyzing the social impact of IPRs because the approach defines the purpose of development as enlarging the choices and capabilities that people have to lead a life they value. This framework focuses on a wide range of actual and potential human consequences that are of concern to diverse peoples in the world.

The next edition will focus on “Food, Climate Change and Intellectual Property: Defining the Issue.” PIIPA is now accepting online submissions for this edition and encourages intellectual property professionals around the world to contribute to this body of knowledge. Online Submission guidelines can be found in the ‘About’ section of the website. The deadline submission is 30-June-2012.

New consent platform for genomic research subjects

April 25, 2012

The Portable Legal Consent for Common Genomics Research, developed by the Consent to Research project, is a system through which users can donate their data to databases that remove identifying details, such as name and e-mail address. The databases then assign an identification number to all of the data from each user and deliver the de-identified data to researchers, who must agree to broad conditions designed to prevent harm to the data contributors.

The project received approval from ethics reviewers on 23 April; as soon as May, anyone will be able to sign the consent and begin contributing their own data to the database. PLC is headed by iCommons Board member John Wilbanks.

See announcement in Nature.

Neylon joins PLOS as Director of Advocacy

April 17, 2012

iCommons Board member Dr. Cameron Neylon has been appointed as Director of Advocacy at Public Library of Science.

According to the PLoS announcement:

Cameron is well known in the scientific community, recognized for his professionalism, experience, vision and influence in scholarly publishing, communication, and research. His attendance at the Budapest Open Access Initiative meeting, advisory role for the Scholarly Communication in Africa Program, and leadership of the Open Society Foundation funded Beyond Impact project are recent examples of his focus on web technology to enhance research communication….

In his new position, Cameron will promote advocacy of open access and develop strategies to drive the broader reinvention of research communication, both within the existing PLoS journals and beyond. He will work with other Open Access advocates, funders, publishers and scholarly societies to raise awareness and promote the adoption of research communication systems that support the public’s access and contribution to research….

His knowledge of policy and the scientific community in the EU and Asia/Pacific region will be a great asset to PLoS. He is among the most effective, articulate and balanced advocates of open and collaborative science, and of quality, speed and sustainability in research communication.

New book: The Digital Public Domain: Foundations for an Open Culture

Edited by Melanie Dulong de Rosnay and Juan Carlos De Martin, the book “The Digital Public Domain: Foundations for an Open Culture” has just been released. It contains essays by academics, librarians, entrepreneurs, activists and policy makers, who were all part of the EU-funded Communia project. These authors argue that the Public Domain – that is, the informational works owned by all of us, be that literature, music, the output of scientific research, educational, material or public sector information – is fundamental to a healthy society.

Under a CC Attribution license, the PDF can be downloaded here.

The book can be purchased in all formats (hardback, paperback, and digital editions) on the website of OpenBookPublishers.

The book is an output of the Communia European Thematic Network on the Digital Public Domain which took place between 2007 and 2011 and is at the origin of Communia International Association.

UK Press covers Open Science

April 10, 2012

Open Science is getting attention by some of the UK’s most prominent mainstream journalists.

The Guardian ran a lead story in Monday’s Guardian. See Alok Jha, Wellcome Trust joins ‘academic spring’ to open up science, at

Eddie Mair of BBC Radio 4 also hosted a discussion between Prof. Stephen Curry of Imperial College and Graham Taylor of the UK Publishers Association at http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b01ddxcs at 24:19 minutes.