icommons

log in
new to icommons.org? register

            
type a tag | tag cloud
meu painel
publish/create
editing queue
voting queue
icommons blog

Altemark on flickr.com New upgrades to icommons.org

We have some exciting new upgrades to icommons.org to report! The latest updates to the site include:
- The ability to upload vertical pictures along with horizontal pictures to the site. We've also set the minimum picture size from 600 to 420 pixels, and you can upload both jpgs and pngs.
- Additions to our list of embedded videos that can be supported on the site - now video... more

 
State of Piracy in the Philippines
1
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 24th, 2007 6:07 pm · 41 votes · 17 comments
 
Pirate DVDs with quality stickers indicating that this is not a cinema recording, by miskan on flickr.com: http://flickr.com/photos/miskan/32664810/, CC BY-NC 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/)
Pirate DVDs with quality stickers indicating that this is not a cinema recording, by by miskan on flickr.com: http://flickr.com/photos/miskan/32664810/
Not many of us in law school would deny owning a copy or two of pirated media, be it a VCD, DVD, or a song downloaded from Limewire or BitTorrent. In a survey conducted among 100 law students, 44 responded in the affirmative when asked if it’s the cheap price alone that motivates them to patronise piracy. Other factors include the competitive quality of pirated discs, availability, and that they’re easily returnable in case of defect.

In the same survey, 60 respondents claim that even if the retail price of pirated products are totally eradicated, they would rather resort to other means of obtaining copies such as peer-to-peer file sharing instead of buying the originals.

We’re Being Watched
Every year the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) conducts a review of countries included in its Priority Watch List, among which is the Philippines. The IIPA is a private sector coalition formed in 1984 to represent U.S. copyright-based industries. It works closely with the U.S. Trade Representative in the annual Special 301 reviews and examination of trade conditions.

According to IIPA’s 2006 Special 301 Report, released early this year, copyright piracy in the Philippines has caused estimated losses to U.S. copyright industries in the amount of $123.6 million in 2005. These industries include motion pictures, records and music, business and entertainment software, and books.

Continued inclusion in the watch list puts Philippine trade privileges at risk. The Philippines currently enjoys the benefits of the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, which offers duty-free imports of Philippine products into the U.S. In 2003, $894.7 million worth of Philippine products entered the U.S. duty-free. In 2004, at least $890.5 million worth of products were exported under the same exemption. This favorable condition might be removed if the Philippines fails to meet the discretionary criteria of U.S. law, one of which is the adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights.

What is piracy?
Piracy is an infringement of intellectual property rights (IPR), which is defined as rights that “allow people to own their creativity and innovation in the same way they can own physical property. The owner of intellectual property (IP) can control and be rewarded for its use, and this encourages further innovation and creativity to the benefit of us all.”

In our country, the law in place is the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293), which generally protects copyright, trademarks, and patents.

Copyright is often attributed to artistic and literary works such as films, music, books, photos, drawings, broadcasts, software, and multimedia. It exists from the moment of creation of the work, which must be both original and recorded in some tangible medium. Although registration is required for trademarks and patents, no formalities are needed in order for copyright to exist.

Increased Supply of Pirated Products
Imports of pirated optical discs from Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, China, Hong Kong and Taiwan have dramatically increased since 2004. This upsurge in supply has led to the lowering of prices of pirated products so as to ruin the legitimate market. Pirated VCD’s and DVD’s now sell for a measly P25 to P70, vis-ŕ-vis the originals which sell for P100 to P700. Legitimate video and music retail stores have to compete with the black market by lowering their prices, eventually incurring losses that lead them to close shop.

Not only are pirated products imported, they are also produced locally. Book piracy, for example, is prevalent. This includes illegal photocopying, pirate offset printing, and books burned on CD’s. On the other hand, the increased availability of broadband Internet has also increased illegal downloads, distribution of burned CD’s and DVD’s, and unauthorised exploitation of popular entertainment software titles.

In terms of optical disc production, the IIPA suspects the existence of at least 16 optical disc factories and 38 operation lines in the country, with an estimated overall production capacity of 133 million discs per year. It also believes that “covert production facilities, often protected by law enforcement and local government officials, remain in existence both in remote areas of Luzon and within the major cities…. One of the main pirates ‘burning’ content onto CD-R’s operates just one floor above the residence of the director of the NBI.”

State of Copyright Enforcement
Despite the issuance of the implementing rules and regulations of the Optical Media Act and the establishment of the Optical Media Board (OMB) headed by Edu Manzano, much remains to be desired in the state of copyright enforcement. OMB continues to conduct raids to stop pirate production, distribution, and retail activities, much like its predecessor, the Videogram Regulatory Board (VRB), has done. However, the IIPA laments that these raids are “largely non-deterrent, as stores closed due to raids often reopened the following day.” While the OMB carried out the largest bust in a Quiapo mall in December 2004 resulting in the seizure of over US$8 million (with a street value of P476.25 million) worth of pirated products, “these statistics also indicate the massive scope of the piracy problem.”

Exacerbating the poor state of enforcement is the lack of IP expertise among the regional prosecutors and the judges of the “Special Commercial Courts.” To remedy this situation, these courts will soon be replaced by special IP courts that will handle intellectual property-related cases only, as per the Supreme Court en banc resolution dated July 26, 2005. The resolution was based on the proposal of IPO Director General Adrian Cristobal Jr.

As of March 2005, 1,184 IP cases were pending, 993 of which is in Manila.

Moreover, the role of the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) in IP enforcement has been unclear. In 2001 the IPO was moved from the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to the Office of the President, where it can coordinate with the Philippine National Police and Bureau of Investigation. In 2004 it was moved back to the DTI. This move seems to have no effect.

Pending bills in Congress aim to amend the IP Code in order to implement the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) treaties (WIPO Copyright Treaty and WIPO Performance and Phonograms Treaty) fully, and pass cybercrime legislation covering all copyrighted materials.

Attitude Shift

In an interview published in Fudge (August 2005), Christopher Sy, Managing Director of EMI Music Philippines and Anti-Piracy Chairman of the Philippine Association of Recording Industry (PARI) observed that, “People don’t download music because they are poor. Rich people do it as well. It’s just because they can get something for less money. Plus they don’t see it as something… major. ‘It doesn’t seem so bad. Who am I hurting?’ The real challenge in piracy is more of an attitude shift. People know piracy is bad but people do it. It’s like smoking…”

Annie Alejo, editor-in-chief of Fudge, writes, “With every click of that download button or a P75 transaction, we help in the proliferation of illegal digital music downloads and pirated audio/video discs – an activity that affects numerous faceless individuals. Who are we hurting, you ask? No one, you assure yourself, until it’s someone you know.”

Sy goes on to express, “It’s not just taking money out of, say, Martin Nievera’s pocket… At the same time, it’s Mr. Warehouse that loses his job. It’s Mr. Accountant, Mr. Label Manager, Ms. Marketing Assistant, all the way to the Managing Directors…. [B]ecause fans love a certain band, they have an affinity with the artist. ‘When I buy the album, tatagal sila sa eksena… and ako ang masaya sa huli. I want them to create more music… ”

With excerpts from the International Intellectual Property Alliance 2006 Special 301 Report and Ms. Annie S. Alejo of Fudge Magazine

tags: makati philippines education piracy philippines


  comments rss add a comment  
 
Great article, Sara Jane!
Michelle Thorne · Berlin (Germany) · Oct 24th, 2007 6:07 pm
1 out of 2 people believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

Thanks, Michelle!
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 24th, 2007 6:12 pm
0 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

Do you have local artists published their works under CC?

and maybe you could interview the students in business school, to see whether they have ideas or strategies about how to make profit under such circumstances/models (i mean, even without adopting CC). :)
TzuChiang Liou · Taipei (Taiwan) · Oct 24th, 2007 6:19 pm
2 out of 2 people believe this is useful
your take: useful lame

Yes. There's one band in the Philippines that I know of who published their songs under a CC license, and quite a few who published their photos in flickr. The band's a good one; they call themselves Sundown Caffeine. My personal favorite song of theirs is "Sunflowers and Dust."

Your idea regarding the business school is worth exploring. I'll see what I can do and I'll keep you posted. Thanks, Liou!
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 24th, 2007 6:27 pm
0 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

Nice read, Sara Jane! let's go protect artists rights!!
-www.dorannelim.com
doranne · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 24th, 2007 7:22 pm
1 out of 2 people believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

The rights owners seem to be fighting a losing battle against the pirates where there is no apparent incentive for people to buy legal content, aside from the legalities.
Paul Jacobson · Johannesburg Gauteng (South Africa) · Oct 24th, 2007 10:40 pm
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

Hi Sara Jane - this is really interesting. To see the development of the government's response to piracy. I noticed you mentioned that nearly all the cases were pending in Manila... do you know if the experience of piracy is different outside the capitol? or concern regarding potential enforcement measures?
alli.fish · Tucson/Irvine/Bangalore (India) (United States) · Oct 24th, 2007 11:44 pm
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

"The rights owners seem to be fighting a losing battle against the pirates where there is no apparent incentive for people to buy legal content, aside from the legalities."
- Paul Jacobson · Johannesburg Gauteng (South Africa)

I agree. As what Mr. Sy of EMI Music Phils. said, an attitude shift among the people seems to be in order. They should realize that by not patronizing their fave artists, they are hurting the artists and their crafts.

The government through its IP Office has taken the initiative in encouraging the formation of collective societies so that the private sector and the rights holders can be more involved.

I hope the effort pays off.
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 25th, 2007 9:08 am
0 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

alli.fish wrote "Hi Sara Jane - this is really interesting. To see the development of the government's response to piracy. I noticed you mentioned that nearly all the cases were pending in Manila... do you know if the experience of piracy is different outside the capitol? or concern regarding potential enforcement measures?"

Based on personal experience, the piracy situation in one of the provinces, particularly Bataan, is quite different. There are very few sellers of pirated discs to be found. Raids occur infrequently, and here lies corruption. Policemen once seized the pirated goods for themselves, in exchange for not arresting the sellers.

People outside the capitol tend to settle brushes against the law among themselves rather than resort to court intervention.
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 25th, 2007 9:13 am
0 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

What about the other reasons for obtaining unauthorised media products?
(1) Regional Coding. Regional Coding prevents a purchaser from playing a legitimately purchased product just because she bought it in another country. What about the interference with the purchasers rights of ownership?
(2) Technical Protection Measures. TPM's make legitimately media difficult to play especially on old equipment.

On the other hand unauthorised copies do not have these deliberate technical defects. By creating dysfunctional products old media companies are creating an incentive for people to obtain them elsewhere.

Andrew Rens · Cape Town (South Africa) · Oct 26th, 2007 9:00 pm
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

The term 'piracy' is employed for marketing reasons by certain old media multi-national corporations and shouldn't be accepted uncritically.

To use the word to describe infringement of copyright statutes is demeaning to all those who suffer the trauma of piracy; violence, rape and killing.


Andrew Rens · Cape Town (South Africa) · Oct 26th, 2007 9:04 pm
2 out of 2 people believe this is useful
your take: useful lame

I agree with Andrew. I would also be interested to know how the increased access to media commodities facilitated by piracy impacts and transforms Philippine culture.
Prashant (India) · Oct 27th, 2007 1:46 am
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

re: Prashant's comment

That merits another study altogether.
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 30th, 2007 10:24 am
0 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

re: Andres Ken's comment

The use of the term "piracy" in this article is properly put into context.
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 30th, 2007 10:25 am
0 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

Sara I don't agree that your use of the term piracy is justified.

The article purports to define piracy as follows: "Piracy is an infringement of intellectual property rights (IPR), which is defined as rights that “allow people to own their creativity and innovation in the same way they can own physical property."

Britannica defines piracy: "robbery or other violent action, for private ends and without authorization by public authority, committed on the seas or in the air outside the normal jurisdiction of any state"

This is close to the legal definition. Since there is a legal definition of piracy, which has nothing to do with copyright infringement, and there is a legal definition of copyright infringement the use of the word piracy in the context does not serve legal analysis.

Andrew Rens · Cape Town (South Africa) · Oct 30th, 2007 10:15 pm
1 out of 1 person believes this is useful
your take: useful lame

Depends where you come from. Piracy has come to be culturally defined here as one referring to bootlegging copies of films or music on discs. The original concept of piracy, as it was anciently known and is still legally defined, a la Jack Sparrow and the Black Pearl, is outdated.
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 31st, 2007 10:13 am
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame

Although, yes, piracy is still a crime against humanity and triable in all courts, as per the universality principle in international law.
Sara Jane · Manila (Philippines) · Oct 31st, 2007 10:29 am
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame
 


  add a comment: you must be logged on in order to comment. please log in or register at iCommons.org and and your comments right after.