icommons

log in
new to icommons.org? register

            
type a tag | tag cloud
meu painel
publish/create
editing queue
voting queue
icommons blog

John Spooner Revisioning iCommons

In 2005, iCommons was established as an outgrowth of Creative Commons with an objective to ‘advance the wider dissemination of non-commercial sharing of scientific, creative and other intellectual works by the general public’. Creative Commons was the sole member, guarantor and sponsor of the charity, providing organisational and financial support.

Today, iCommons has a small,... more

 
The Business of Free Music
1
Kiruba Shankar · Chennai (India) · Jan 30th, 2008 8:17 pm · 29 votes · 6 comments
 
Listen free on Last.fm, kaysha on flickr.com (http://flickr.com/photos/kaysha/96193492/), CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/)
Listen free on Last.fm, by kaysha on flickr.com
Victoria Shannon has a well written article in the International Herald Tribune titled "Mainstream music industry realizes the value of 'free'". It brings to light the changing scenario in the music scene that's rather fascinating. I have highlighted key points points from the article for easy reading.

Ten years ago, major music companies worldwide earned a whopping $38 billion in revenues from sales of music. In 2008, that revenue will halve to $17 billion. The reason? Well, it’s the free exchange of music over the Internet…something that all of us have done it one time or the other.

A report from Jupiter Research states that for every song that is legally bought, about 100 songs are illegally exchanged on the net. Ninety-four percent of the folks surveyed have vehemently stated that they dislike paying for music.

The music industry has realised that it’s very difficult to compete with free. So, what do they decide to do? Instead of fighting against ‘free’, they have decided to join the bandwagon.

On Last.fm, for instance, you can play a song three times before you are prompted to buy it. This allows people to sample the music and the results show that there has been an increase in the sales.

"Free is not the opposite of pay,” says Laurent Krantz, chief executive of Jamendo, a free peer-to-peer site based in Luxembourg that focuses on Creative Commons licensed music. You can voluntarily choose to give your music for free. For example, Jamison Young, an Australian artist now based in Oslo, has chosen to break his contact with a record company and is now freely giving away his music via his website and MySpace. He says by giving his music for free, it has helped it to reach a wider audience. He makes more money now by doing live concerts where people pay to attend.

RadioVerve, an Indian Internet Radio Station, encourages local musicians to put their music on their site where they play it to an audience who likes music. The audience pays nothing to listen to music. The catch? You can only listen but you can't download. The artists don't mind earning nothing out this because they get the exposure. Some have gone to cut a record label while some have got opportunities to perform at concerts. While everything is free, it interestingly leads to ways to earn money.

It’s something that the software industry that has perfected this ‘trialware’ method and now the music industry is warming up to it.

tags: chennai india culture music download cc


  comments rss add a comment  
 
Hey Kiruba... I think there's a word or two missing from this sentence: "Recently saw the launch of Qtrax..." Would you add? :)
Daniela Faris · Johannesburg (South Africa) · Jan 29th, 2008 7:38 pm
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame

Thanks for pointing this one , Dan. I have changed that particular sentence to make it grammatically right.
Kiruba Shankar · Chennai (India) · Jan 29th, 2008 11:54 pm
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame

You may want to qualify the references to Qtrax as their launch is basically on hold while they're haggling with the record companies. Not sure how that'll play out...
Francis Deblauwe · Saratoga, CA (United States) · Jan 30th, 2008 5:01 am
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame

Francis, great point. I did notice they ran into trouble and rechecked news now. Looks like the deal with the record companies is completely off. Oh, what a disaster for them. I have since removed any reference to Qtrax.

Thanks again.
Kiruba Shankar · Chennai (India) · Jan 30th, 2008 7:00 am
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame

I think it is important to remember the difference between free as in Last.fm and so on and free as in free culture. Just to give a simple example, I cannot hear any of the freely available content from last.fm - they block it in Poland for some arcane reasons.

But the main difference is that this freely available "mainstream" has no rights attached to them other than those arising from vague, and shifting from country to country, fair use (and similar) rules. People of course make their own rights and copy / remix quite happily... But it's a different model than CC.

So I think we need to think carefully before we include this type of rhetoric (Chris Anderson is writing a book about such "free" content and I don't think he's considering free licensing too much) - it might thin down what we mean by free in this community.

And the interesting thing is that it might be sidetracking fully what CC is doing. Because you don't need some fancy licensing scheme when the content is just there to take! And all is fine until all sorts of copywarrior authorities step in and take legal action. Some people in our community will say that it's a win over an over-licensed situation. But I think it's instead a win of a technology, that dictates freedom of content and freedom to remix now - but might not do so another day. CC seems like a way to trump technology with human rules - even if some (me included) would prepare community / social rules to be used instead of legal ones.
Alek Tarkowski · Warszawa (Poland) · Feb 07th, 2008 8:04 am
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame

Scott Havemann This is exactly the market we at www.freemusic.co.za are getting ourselves into! Please support us when our site becomes available as we are pushing to promote free music from worldwide musicians !!!

Should anyone wish to send their music they wish posted on our site or render their services to our IT department please dont hesitate to email me on scotthavemann@alltheweb.co.za! Happy listening and extremely nice articles well done
Scott Havemann (South Africa) · Mar 01st, 2008 12:06 am
your call: is this comment useful?
your take: useful lame
 


  add a comment: you must be logged on in order to comment. please log in or register at iCommons.org and and your comments right after.